Burgess-Jackson, Keith (2020) The Whole Truth about Partial Truth Tables. Open Journal of Philosophy, 10 (02). pp. 192-219. ISSN 2163-9434
![[thumbnail of ojpp_2020050715075839.pdf]](http://geographical.go2journals.com/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
ojpp_2020050715075839.pdf - Published Version
Download (1MB)
Abstract
Partial truth tables have two salient virtues. First, like whole truth tables, they are algorithmic (i.e., effective). If you construct them correctly, you will get an answer to your question whether a particular argument is valid; whether a particular proposition is tautologous, self-contradictory, or contingent; or whether a particular set of propositions is consistent. Second, they are less time-consuming and tedious to construct than whole truth tables. No partial truth table has more than three rows, and many have only one. A whole truth table, by contrast, may have as many as 32, 64, 128, or 256 rows (or more). In this essay, I explain what a partial truth table is and show how such a table is constructed. I then apply the partial-truth-table technique successively to arguments, individual propositions, and sets of two or more propositions. I conclude by evaluating the most widely used logic textbooks, showing what they do well and where they fall short.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Opene Prints > Social Sciences and Humanities |
Depositing User: | Managing Editor |
Date Deposited: | 01 Jul 2023 06:56 |
Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2023 05:25 |
URI: | http://geographical.go2journals.com/id/eprint/2288 |